Understanding ChainLinkGod-eth’s Vote Against AIP-1.05
On April 10th, the snapshot voting page showed that Chainlink Community Ambassador ChainLinkGod-eth voted against AIP-1.05, a proposal by the Arbitrum community to \”return the rema
On April 10th, the snapshot voting page showed that Chainlink Community Ambassador ChainLinkGod-eth voted against AIP-1.05, a proposal by the Arbitrum community to “return the remaining 700 million ARBs of the foundation to the DAO, And stated in the tweet: I will vote for AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2 instead of AIP-1.05. The first two AIPs fully addressed my initial concerns about AIP-1, which poses unnecessary risks to DAOs and foundations. I doubt whether this is a credible neutral measure. If some people receive compensation while others do not, it sets a precedent where some may not receive compensation when key rotation occurs. Currently, the AIP-1.05 proposal votes in favor of it The rate is 51.68%, and the opposition rate is 46.72%. The vote will end on April 15th.
ChainLinkGod. eth opposes Arbitrum AIP-1.05, with a current opposition rate of nearly 47%
Chainlink Community Ambassador ChainLinkGod-eth recently voted against AIP-1.05 on the snapshot voting page. This proposal by the Arbitrum community aims to return the remaining 700 million ARBs of the foundation to the DAO. In a tweet, ChainLinkGod-eth stated that he would vote for AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2 instead, which fully addressed his initial concerns about AIP-1.
What is the AIP-1.05 Proposal?
The proposal to return the remaining 700 million ARBs of the foundation to the DAO is one that has been put forward by the Arbitrum community. The aim of this proposal is to create a more equitable system where everyone receives compensation when key rotation occurs. Currently, certain members of the DAO receive compensation while others do not. This creates an unfair precedent that the community is not willing to let continue.
ChainLinkGod-eth’s Concerns About AIP-1
ChainLinkGod-eth has voiced his concerns about AIP-1, stating that it poses unnecessary risks to DAOs and foundations. He doubts whether it is a credible neutral measure, especially if some people receive compensation while others do not. He believes that this sets a precedent where some members of the community may not receive compensation when key rotation occurs.
ChainLinkGod-eth’s Support for AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2
ChainLinkGod-eth has shown his support for AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2, stating that they fully addressed his initial concerns about AIP-1. Both AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2 address the issue of compensation for all members of the DAO, ensuring that everyone receives a fair share. This way, there will be no precedent set where some members do not receive compensation while others do.
Current Voting Results for AIP-1.05
Currently, the vote for AIP-1.05 is split with a 51.68% in favor rate and a 46.72% opposition rate. This vote is set to end on April 15th, and the community is waiting to see what the final results will be.
Conclusion
ChainLinkGod-eth’s vote against AIP-1.05 has highlighted key concerns with the proposal and sparked debate within the community. However, his support for AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2 offers a potential solution to the problem of compensation for all members of the DAO. As the vote draws to a close on April 15th, the community waits to see what the final results will be.
FAQs
1. What is the proposal to return the remaining 700 million ARBs of the foundation to the DAO?
The proposal aims to create a more equitable system where everyone receives compensation when key rotation occurs. Currently, certain members of the DAO receive compensation while others do not.
2. What are ChainLinkGod-eth’s concerns about AIP-1?
ChainLinkGod-eth believes that AIP-1 poses unnecessary risks to DAOs and foundations. He doubts whether it is a credible neutral measure, especially if some people receive compensation while others do not. He believes that this sets a precedent where some members of the community may not receive compensation when key rotation occurs.
3. What are AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2?
AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2 both address the issue of compensation for all members of the DAO, ensuring that everyone receives a fair share. This way, there will be no precedent set where some members do not receive compensation while others do.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent SipPop's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.sippop.com/20521.htm
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.