Celestia and Optimism: Not Competitors, but Complementary

02/24/2023 12:17 • Blockchain Buzz • 160 views

On February 24, Nick White, founder of the modular blockchain network Celestia, said on social media about the positioning difference between Celestia and Optimism (after the launch of OP stack) that Celestia and Optimism are not competitive, and the two are complementary. Celestia is Layer1 that can produce blockspace, while Optimism will build rollups based on Layer1’s blockspace.

Founder of Celestia: Celestia and Optimism are not competitive, they are complementary

Interpret the above information:

Blockchain technology has been lauded as a breakthrough in the digital sphere since its inception. However, as the technology evolved and more and more projects were built on top of blockchain, it became clear that scalability was a major issue. This led to the development of layered blockchain solutions, which aimed to address the scalability problems by introducing parallel processing, improved speed, and reduced costs.

Two such solutions in the market are Celestia and Optimism. According to Nick White, the founder of Celestia, the two solutions are not competitors but complementary. He noted on social media on February 24, that Celestia and Optimism have different roles to play in the blockchain ecosystem. Celestia operates at Layer1, producing blockspace, while Optimism builds rollups based on that blockspace.

Layer1 solutions focus on creating a foundation for blockchain networks. It places emphasis on the underlying infrastructure such as hardware and software, and establishes the network rules and protocols. Celestia, being a modular blockchain network, is designed to function as a Layer1 solution, producing blockspace that can be utilized by other projects.

Optimism, on the other hand, is a Layer2 solution that centers on scalability. It employs rollups, which bundle up multiple transactions into a single transaction, reducing the amount of data that needs to be stored on the main chain. With improved transaction processing and reduced network congestion, the network can support more participants, thereby improving its scalability.

In essence, while Celestia is focused on providing the underlying infrastructure needed for a blockchain, Optimism is focused on improving scalability by maximizing the available blockspace. This way, both solutions work hand in hand without competing, addressing critical issues in the blockchain ecosystem.

In conclusion, the development of layered blockchain solutions is a significant breakthrough in the blockchain ecosystem, as it addresses the scalability issues. Celestia and Optimism are two solutions that provide unique contributions to the blockchain network, fulfilling different roles in the ecosystem while complementing each other. It is clear that the future of blockchain technology relies on the ability of different entities to collaborate and work harmoniously towards the same goal.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent SipPop's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.sippop.com/3059.htm

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Celestia and Optimism: Not Competitors, but Complementary

Founder of Celestia: Celestia and Optimism are not competitive, they are complementary

Related recommendations