Tokens Using Mortgage Agreements May Be Considered Securities Under U.S. Law

According to reports, Gary Gensler, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, advised reporters on Wednesday that tokens using mortgage agreements can

Tokens Using Mortgage Agreements May Be Considered Securities Under U.S. Law

According to reports, Gary Gensler, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, advised reporters on Wednesday that tokens using mortgage agreements can be considered securities under U.S. law. Gensler said, “The investing public is investing in expected returns, expecting something from these tokens, regardless of whether they are proof of equity tokens. They also want to receive returns from these proof of equity tokens and receive returns of 2%, 4%, and 18%.”

SEC Chairman: Tokens using mortgage agreements can be considered securities

Analysis based on this information:

The recent reports suggest that the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Gary Gensler, stated in a press briefing that the tokens that utilize mortgage agreements could be classified as securities according to U.S. law. The chairman explained that investors are making investments in tokens to receive expected returns, whether or not they are the proof of equity tokens. Also, they want to get substantial returns from these tokens, ranging from 2% to 18%.

The statement from Gensler is essential as it addresses the ambiguity surrounding the classification of tokens as securities. It suggests that the commission is taking a closer look at the tokens that use mortgage agreements and how their issuance and trading should be regulated. The question comes at a time when the token market is showing immense growth, with investors trying to put their money into tokens that could potentially yield high returns.

The chairman’s statement suggests that investors who purchase such tokens expect to receive outstanding returns, which, in any instance, indicates the tokens’ security characteristics. If the tokens are indeed a type of security, then they should be subject to regulatory scrutiny and oversight to ensure that investors are informed of the risks associated with their investment decisions.

Moreover, the statement highlights that the SEC aims to regulate the issuance and sale of tokens that use various forms of collateral or agreements. This will potentially lead to more transparency and disclosure requirements for token issuers, ensuring that investors have adequate information to make informed investment decisions.

Overall, Gensler’s remarks have significant implications for the future of tokenization and their regulatory framework in the U.S. It suggests that the SEC will be more vigilant and cautious when it comes to the registration and issuance of tokens, and investors will have to be more mindful of their investment decisions.

In conclusion, the chairman’s statement aims to bring clarity to the current regulatory framework of tokens, and we can expect more discussions and developments to follow.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent SipPop's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.sippop.com/5530.htm

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.