SaucerSwap on Hedera Network Susceptible to Compromisation
On March 10, the DeFi project SaucerSwap on Hedera tweeted that a persistent vulnerability had attacked the Hedera network. The target of the vulnerability was
On March 10, the DeFi project SaucerSwap on Hedera tweeted that a persistent vulnerability had attacked the Hedera network. The target of the vulnerability was the decompilation process in the smart contract. An attacker has attacked the Pangolin and HeliSwap pools containing wrapped assets. It is uncertain whether other HTS tokens are also risky. There is no report about the theft of SaucerSwap users’ funds at present, but as a preventive measure, we encourage everyone to withdraw their working capital immediately.
SaucerSwap: Hedera network is attacked, and users are advised to withdraw working capital
Analysis based on this information:
The DeFi project SaucerSwap on Hedera network disclosed on March 10 that a “persistent vulnerability” had targeted the Hedera network. According to the tweet, the vulnerability affected the decompilation process of the smart contract in use. Specifically, the attacker allegedly targeted the wrapped assets in Pangolin and HeliSwap pools, and whether other HTS tokens were also affected remained unclear. Currently, there is no evidence of the theft of SaucerSwap users’ funds. Despite this, the company advised users to withdraw their working capital as a precautionary measure.
The security vulnerability that affected SaucerSwap and Hedera network remains a cause of concern for users and investors. Smart contracts are increasingly critical to the functioning of the DeFi ecosystem. Therefore, any flaw in smart contract security may have a severe impact on the entire network, leading to the loss of user funds and a significant setback for DeFi.
It is not clear how the attackers exploited this vulnerability, but it is significant that they targeted the wrapped assets in only two pools while not exploiting others. This suggests a certain degree of selectivity, which could imply that the attacker may be well-versed in the intricacies of the smart contract’s code. Additionally, the risk concerning other HTS tokens’ safety is uncertain, and further information is necessary to corroborate the extent of the vulnerability.
The immediate recommendation for SaucerSwap users to withdraw their working capital was a necessary step in safeguarding their funds. This precautionary measure can limit the attacker’s ability to gain unauthorized access and potentially mitigate any potential losses. However, there is a need for more comprehensive measures to be put in place to prevent future security breaches. DeFi projects must prioritize security and implement a stringent auditing process to identify vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.
In conclusion, the incident highlights the continued susceptibility of DeFi to security risks. As such, the importance of maintaining security measures and protocol cannot be overstated. Companies must remain vigilant in safeguarding users’ funds and adopt a proactive approach when dealing with potential threats. DeFi is still a nascent field, and there is a need for innovation in securing transactions and mitigating potential risks.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent SipPop's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.sippop.com/7315.htm
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.