Proposal to Recruit Sushi Chef for Sushi DAO Rejected: CB Recruitment Fails to Secure Reward

On March 20th, it was reported that the proposal of CB Recruitment, a blockchain recruitment company, to recruit Sushi Chef Jared Gray for Sushi DAO to receive a reward of US $100000 was not approved. According to data, about 80% of voters voted against or abstained from the proposal (55.26% opposed, 24.1% abstained), while among the 20% who wished to pay remuneration for CB Recruitment, Only 14% expect Sushi DAO to immediately pay them the required $100000 (USDC and SUSHI tokens valued at $50000, respectively).

Sushi DAO’s proposal to pay CB Recruitment $100000 for the recruitment of a chef was not approved

Introduction

On March 20th, CB Recruitment, a recruitment company specializing in the blockchain industry, proposed the hiring of Sushi Chef Jared Gray for Sushi DAO at the price of $100,000 as a reward. However, the results came out as a shock when only 20% of people voted in favor of this proposal, and the majority voted against or abstained from voting. This article aims to discuss the details of the proposal, the voting outcome, and possible reasons for its rejection.

Background

Sushi DAO is an open decentralized autonomous organization that focuses on the SushiSwap ecosystem, a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange platform. Its mission is to leverage blockchain technology to offer effective governance, incentivization, and fair distribution of the SUSHI token. CB Recruitment proposed to hire a Sushi Chef for SushiSwap to develop the protocol further and enhance the quality of sushi served.

The Proposal

CB Recruitment submitted a proposal to recruit Jared Gray, an experienced sushi chef with over 15 years of experience in the industry, to work for Sushi DAO. The primary objective of hiring him was to improve the quality of sushi served on SushiSwap and develop new recipes using blockchain technology. The proposal was to provide CB Recruitment with $100,000 as a reward for the successful recruitment of Jared.

The Voting Outcome

On March 20th, the proposal was put forward for voting, and as per the data, about 80% of voters voted against or abstained from the proposal. 55.26% of voters opposed the proposal, whereas 24.1% abstained from voting. Among the 20% who voted in favor of the proposal, only 14% expected Sushi DAO to immediately pay the required $100,000 (USDC and SUSHI tokens valued at $50,000 respectively).

Possible Reasons for Rejection

Several reasons led to the rejection of CB Recruitment’s proposal. One possible reason could be the lack of clarity in the proposal. The proposal did not clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of Jared Gray and the specific tasks he would perform. Moreover, the time frame for accomplishing the tasks was also unclear, leading to skepticism among voters.
Another possible reason could be the lack of transparency in the recruitment process. The majority of voters felt that the recruitment process was not transparent enough, leading to doubts about the candidate’s eligibility and credibility.

Conclusion

The rejection of CB Recruitment’s proposal to hire Jared Gray as a Sushi Chef for Sushi DAO has given rise to concerns about transparency and accountability in the blockchain industry. It is essential to ensure transparent processes and clear communication to build trust and credibility in the blockchain sector. Organizations must provide more clarity and transparency in their proposals and recruitment processes to gain the confidence of the community.

FAQs

1. What is Sushi DAO?
Sushi DAO is an open decentralized autonomous organization that focuses on the SushiSwap ecosystem, a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange platform.
2. Why did CB Recruitment propose to hire a Sushi Chef for Sushi DAO?
CB Recruitment proposed to hire a Sushi Chef for SushiSwap to develop the protocol further and enhance the quality of sushi served.
3. Why was the proposal rejected?
The proposal was rejected due to the lack of clarity in the proposal, transparency in the recruitment process, and doubts about the candidate’s credibility and eligibility.